Trump's Autopen Claims: A Fact-Check Amidst Biden Executive Order Row
Image Source: Internet
US President Donald Trump has reignited a controversy surrounding the use of an autopen, a machine that replicates a signature, by his successor Joe Biden. Trump's recent threat to revoke all executive orders signed by autopen has sparked debate about the legitimacy of such documents. But how common is the use of autopens for presidential signings? In a recent social media post, Trump claimed that any document signed by Biden using an autopen is 'terminated' and 'of no further force or effect.' He also criticized the use of autopens for formal actions, calling it 'unacceptable.' However, experts point out that the Justice Department has long clarified that the president can direct officials to affix their signature to a document using an autopen. Trump has previously stated that autopens should be used only for 'very insignificant documents.' But what constitutes an insignificant document? According to Trump, it's something as simple as sending a friendly note to a child. However, he has consistently opposed the use of autopens for formal actions like pardons and executive orders. Conservative commentator Ed Whelan weighed in on the debate, saying that Trump can revoke executive orders even if Biden didn't sign them personally. However, Whelan also noted that Trump may not have the same authority to invalidate other documents signed by Biden using an autopen, such as bills enacted by Congress or pardons. The controversy highlights the nuances of presidential signing authority and the role of autopens in the White House. While Trump's claims have sparked debate, it remains to be seen how this will impact the legitimacy of documents signed by autopen in the Biden administration.
