CJI Kant Calls for Uniform Judicial Policy to End Conflicting Court Rulings
Image Source: Internet
New Delhi, India - In a move to reduce unpredictable verdicts and ensure consistency, Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant has proposed the development of a national judicial policy. Speaking at the Supreme Court Bar Association's Constitution Day function, Justice Kant emphasized the importance of a unified approach in the judicial system, where courts can 'speak with clarity and consistency.' The CJI noted that the presence of 25 high courts and several benches of the top court often results in conflicting opinions, which can hinder the rule of law. To address this issue, he suggested creating a uniform national policy that encourages coherence across jurisdictions. Justice Kant also highlighted the crucial role of the Bar in upholding the sanctity of the Constitution and promoting the rule of law. He praised the Bar for their invaluable contributions to the judicial process and emphasized their importance in fortifying the Constitution. The event, which was attended by top judges from six countries, including Chief Justice of Bhutan Lyonpo Norbu Tshering and Chief Justice of Kenya Martha K Koome, marked the first time that foreign judges have witnessed judicial proceedings at the Supreme Court. The foreign judges, who praised the Indian legal system, expressed their admiration for the country's jurisprudence and its ability to uphold the rule of law. They also congratulated Justice Kant on his appointment and expressed their desire to continue working with India to promote the rule of law in common law countries. The SCBA president, Vikas Singh, emphasized the need to finalize the memorandum of procedure for judicial appointments, which would ensure that judges of high calibre are appointed and that the process is credible. The Constitution Day celebration, held on November 26, marks the adoption of the Constitution of India in 1949 and is a significant event in the country's legal calendar. The event serves as a reminder of the importance of the Constitution and the role of the judiciary in upholding its principles.
