Danny Masterson Seeks New Trial, Citing Lawyer Errors and Judicial Bias

Image Source: Internet

LOS ANGELES - Actor Danny Masterson, best known for his role in the hit TV show "That '70s Show," has filed a petition to overturn his two rape convictions and 30-year prison sentence. Masterson claims that his trial lawyer, Philip Cohen, failed to present key witnesses and evidence that could have exonerated him, resulting in a biased trial. According to the petition, Cohen spoke to only two of the 20 potential witnesses identified by Masterson's co-counsel and investigator. These witnesses included experts who could have testified about the effects of alcohol and drugs on memory, and others who would have spoken favorably of Masterson's relationships with the alleged victims. Masterson's lawyer, Eric Multhaup, argues that the second trial was unfair due to prosecutorial misconduct, judicial bias, and the failure of defense counsel to present exculpatory evidence. Multhaup claims that the jury heard only one side of the story and that Masterson deserves a new trial where the jury can hear his side as well. The petition also alleges that the trial judge, Charlaine F. Olmedo, demonstrated bias against the Church of Scientology, allowing an unconstitutional intrusion into the church's doctrine and a misinterpretation of its scripture. Masterson is a member of the Church of Scientology, and the alleged victims are also former members. Masterson's sentence was handed down in 2023, and he is currently serving his time at the California Men's Colony in San Luis Obispo. He will not be eligible for parole for more than 20 years. This development is separate from Masterson's ongoing appeal to the same court. Masterson's case has garnered significant attention due to his association with the Church of Scientology and his high-profile roles in popular TV shows. The actor's career has been impacted by the allegations, with his character being written off his Netflix show "The Ranch" in 2017. Masterson's petition seeks to rectify what he believes was a miscarriage of justice and secure a new trial where he can present his side of the story.